Great news: Two pitbull-type dogs have made it to the semifinalist round for the 2018 American Humane Hero Dog Awards! The American Humane Hero Dog Awards® is an annual campaign that "recognizes heroes on both ends of the leash". The fact that numerous pitbull-type dogs were nominees and that two made it to the semifinalist round is important because it illustrates how breed stereotypes are wrong while at the same time, showcasing how pitbull-type dogs (like all dogs) can be beneficial companions, successful working dogs, and loving family members. Congratulations to Kano for making it to the semifinalist round in the law enforcement category and Roxy for making it to the semifinalist round in the service dog category! Use the links below to vote for them - it's easy and you can vote for one dog in each category per day until July 11th.
Category - Law Enforcement:
Category - Service:
All other semifinalists and categories: https://herodogawards.org/vote/
We are especially excited about Kano because he is also busting breed stereotypes as a successful K9 officer and exemplifying the excellent temperament and trainability that is inherent in pitbull-type dogs.
A big thanks to American Humane and Animal Farm Foundation for all of the work that they do to support, champion, and advocate for pitbull-type dogs!
Great news in Canada: Yesterday, in an important defeat of discriminatory breed-specific legislation (BSL), the province of Quebec abandoned a proposal to enact a province-wide ban against "pitbull-type" dogs and Rottweilers (comparable to a state-wide ban in the U.S.). After reviewing the scientific evidence, listening to expert testimony, and understanding the facts about canine behavior and aggression, Quebec officials firmly rejected the proposed breed-specific ban and decided to instead work on implementing stronger and more effective breed-neutral regulations. Furthermore, Quebec also refuted misinformation including unscientific statistics and fear-based stereotypes about pitbull-type dogs provided by discriminatory special-interest organizations.
There's been no scientific evidence to prove such a ban is effective ... or that the dogs are genetically inclined to be aggressive
Quebec Bill 128 (that we've been closely following) titled "An Act to promote the protection of persons by establishing a framework with regard to dogs" was introduced in April, 2017 and originally included provisions for a breed-specific ban against pitbull-type dogs and Rottweilers. While it at first appeared to have momentum, that momentum quickly came to a halt after citizens of Quebec, responsible dog owners, and public safety experts became aware of the breed-specific provisions in the bill. Now after over a year of review and debate, the bill will be moving forward but without any of the breed-specific provisions. Instead, Bill 128 will include the stronger breed-neutral provisions that were endorsed by numerous public safety and canine behavior experts during the bill's review and testimony sessions.
Breed-specific rules would be problematic ... we want to have rules that will be applied, that will be observed
A big congratulations to the government of Quebec for not only rejecting ineffective and discriminatory breed-specifc legislation, but also for making strong public statements against the misguided and ineffective practice of banning dogs based on appearance or breed. If the amended version of Bill 128 is enacted, it will be a strong endorsement of breed-neutral regulations that improve public safety by addressing all irresponsible dog owners and all dangerous dogs - regardless of a dog's appearance or breed. After reviewing scientific evidence and expert testimony, Quebec is the latest governing body to acknowledge that breed-specific bans are ineffective, not based on science, and that breed-neutral regulations are the superior option for public safety and safer communities.
After meeting the experts ... the government came to the conclusion that targeting a specific race (breed) is not applicable (effective)
There is nothing about a dog’s breed that makes them any more dangerous than another breed ... what is a factor is size, so bigger dogs can do more damage
Meet Bones, a pitbull-type dog adopted from a shelter that quickly learned how to help his human dad, a U.S. veteran, with his PTSD. Now a service dog, Bones is yet another example of the excellent temperament, trainability, and inherent goodness in pitbull-type dogs. In this short but very heart warming video, watch how Bones and his dad rescue each other and build an amazing and unbreakable bond. A big thanks to The Dodo's Pittie Nation for showcasing this beautiful story.
While Breed Specific Legislation (BSL) is being challenged and repealed in multiple cities across the U.S., BSL is now also being challenged in the UK which enacted a national ban against owning certain dog breeds including the Japanese Tosa, Fila Brasileiro, Dogo Argentino, and "pitbull-type" dogs in 1991. An analysis of the effectiveness of the ban has concluded that it has been largely ineffective as it has 100% failed to reduce serious dog bite-related incidents and also 100% failed to eliminate fatal dog attacks. Below, we summarize some of the initial findings from the analysis conducted by the UK's Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee and the RSPCA.
Since the UK enacted the "Dangerous Dogs Act" in 1991:
The legislation is failing the public – since the Dangerous Dogs Act was introduced in 1991, hospital admissions for dog bites in England have risen showing that the law simply isn’t working
After almost 30 years of BSL in the UK, the data is proving that BSL has been ineffective for reducing serious dog bite-related incidents and therefore has not improved public safety. Meanwhile, multiple towns and cities across the U.S. have recently repealed BSL and eliminated their breed-based bans because they have reached similar conclusions. The data and evidence (in multiple cities and countries with BSL) consistently shows that BSL is ineffective and that comprehensive breed-neutral regulations, that address all irresponsible owners and all potentially dangerous dogs (regardless of the dog's appearance or breed), are far more effective.
The fact is that the way a dog looks and his breed is not a predictor of whether he or she is likely to be aggressive
The government is responsible for protecting the public ... so it is essential that laws evolve alongside our understanding of what works
We are fairly confident that after the UK completes their investigation into the effectiveness of BSL that they will eliminate their ineffective breed-based policies and replace them with stronger and more effective breed-neutral regulations that not only benefit public safety, but also responsible dog owners and their four-legged family members.
Great news in Colorado: Last night, Castle Rock repealed Breed Specific Legislation (BSL) which banned pitbull-type dogs within the city and replaced it with more effective and equitable breed-neutral regulations. Supported by robust public support from city residents, the Town Council voted unanimously (5-0) to put an end to the ineffective and discriminatory BSL that banned dogs within the city based only on their appearance or breed. The vote replaces the city's BSL, which had been in place for 25 years, with stronger and more effective breed-neutral regulations that include well-defined provisions to more effectively address irresponsible ownership and dogs that have previously shown to be aggressive or dangerous.
Congratulations to the Castle Rock Town Council for voting to improve public safety by replacing ineffective BSL with stronger breed-neutral regulations that address all potentially dangerous dogs and all irresponsible owners, regardless of the dog's appearance or breed. Additionally, the Town Council can also be congratulated for rejecting long-debunked myths and stereotypes about pitbull-type dogs, misinformation, inaccurate statistics, and discriminatory agendas from special-interest organizations that they received in a number of comments, emails, and letters (that we also reviewed) through the public comment process. Moreover, the majority of public comments were in favor of repealing BSL.
Law enforcement officials also spoke out, telling the council that lifting the ban would not jeopardize safety
A citizen-driven grassroots group in Castle Rock, End Castle Rock BSL, began its efforts over a year ago to help repeal BSL within the city. The group collaborated and worked with the broader Castle Rock community, animal control, and the town government to replace the city's BSL with more effective and more equitable breed-neutral regulations. This demonstrates how a small but focused group of citizens can work with the community and the city government to successfully promote and bring about positive change. A big thank you to End Castle Rock BSL for their work towards ending ineffective and discriminatory BSL in Castle Rock.
BSL in Colorado is unpopular and rare as only 8 of Colorado's 271 municipalities have BSL enacted. And as of today, there are now only 7 cities in Colorado with BSL (mostly in the Denver metro area) - Castle Rock represents the first of these cities with BSL in Colorado to successfully repeal it. We believe that Castle Rock's model for repealing BSL with stronger, enforceable, and well-defined breed-neutral regulations can be used as a model to repeal BSL in other cities and towns that still have BSL - including Denver, Miami, and others. Castle Rock's new comprehensive and well-defined breed-neutral regulations made it an easy vote for the Town Council that benefits great dogs, responsible dog owners, and public safety.
The data confirms that serious dog bite-related incidents are not a breed-specific issue:
Breed Specific Legislation (BSL) is ineffective and obsolete given the number of different breeds and dog types associated with serious dog bite-related incidents such as fatal dog attacks. Furthermore, the number of incidents associated with each breed is more closely related to each breed's population size and its risk rate than to any "inherent risk" in a specific breed or dog type.
To reduce the number of serious dog bite-related incidents and improve public safety, the data shows that comprehensive breed-neutral regulations are the more effective and equitable solution because they address all potentially dangerous dogs and all irresponsible owners, regardless of the dog's appearance or breed. Public safety is not a breed-specific issue.
Meet Murphy, a pitbull-type dog adopted from a shelter that helped his human mom through hard times and also had no problem with accepting 4 more pitbull-type cousins into his family. In this short video, watch how Murphy and his family combat breed stereotypes and exemplify the inherent goodness of the human-canine bond. A big thanks to The Dodo's popular "Pittie Nation" short video series for continuing to *shatter* stereotypes about pitbull-type dogs.
All strong or large dogs (of any breed) can cause serious injuries or worse, fatalities. Over a 20 year period, a CDC study identified over 30 different breeds involved in fatal dog bite-related incidents in the U.S. alone. Just last month on March 7, there was a sad and unfortunate tragedy in Virginia when the family dog, a northern breed (Malamute/wolf-hybrid mix), fatally attacked an 8-day old baby girl. The attack happened when the baby was left unattended in her bassinet while her mother was preparing lunch in the kitchen. The dog was loved, properly cared for, had never previously shown any signs of aggression, and was described as "very friendly". It’s a tragedy that emphasizes the importance of always carefully supervising strong or large dogs (of any breed) when they are around infants and children - including loved and well-behaved family dogs. To educate on this point, below we list the 30+ different breeds and dog types identified in a CDC study that were involved in fatal dog attacks - evidence that attempting to legislate dogs based on appearance or breed is an ineffective and obsolete approach for safety because a wide variety of dog types and many different breeds and mixes have been implicated in serious incidents.
30+ breeds and dog types implicated in fatal dog attacks (alphabetical order):
The fact is that any strong or large dogs (of any breed) can cause serious incidents - including dogs that are considered the loved, family dog. This highlights why breed-based bans and breed-specific legislation (BSL) are ineffective because there are many different dog types, breeds, and mixes that can become aggressive and cause injuries or worse, fatalities. And while comprehensive breed-neutral regulations are the most effective approach because they address all potentially dangerous dogs (regardless of breed) and all irresponsible dog owners, tragic incidents will unfortunately occur and the extensive breed list above is clear evidence that these incidents are not a breed-specific issue - proper training, supervision, and safety awareness is required for all strong or large dogs, regardless of breed.
Breed discrimination and breed-based bans are on the decline. In a recent (2014) national survey, 84% of those polled were against any form of breed-specific bans. Since only last November, 10 more cities in the U.S. and Canada have repealed breed-specific bans targeting pitbull-type dogs. And below, we highlight a few key points from a recent (2018) infographic analysis by Online Masters in Public Health titled "Pitbulls Aren't a Public Health Threat" (shared below with permission*) that considered facts and information relevant to pitbull-type dogs and concluded:
Pitbull prejudice is often based in stigma an shaky information - in reality, like all dogs, pitbulls are perfectly safe given proper care, treatment, and responsible ownership
Breed-specific bans are unpopular:
There is significant bias in media coverage:
Other key points:
The infographic is shared below*:
*Source: Online Masters in Public Health.
Click "Read More" to view the infographic if it is not displayed directly below.
Great news: Since only February, four more cities have repealed breed-specific legislation (BSL) against pitbull-type dogs including Reynoldsburg OH, Lakewood OH, Ironton MO, and Anamosa IA. A big congratulations to these cities for repealing discriminatory breed-specific legislation that multiple peer-reviewed studies have concluded is ineffective for reducing serious dog bite incidents. Almost always, ineffective breed-based bans are replaced with more effective comprehensive breed-neutral regulations that improve public safety by addressing all dangerous dogs and irresponsible ownership - regardless of the dog's breed. Below, we summarize the key differences between breed-specific and breed-neutral regulations and highlight the reasons why comprehensive breed-neutral regulations are the widely preferred standard and the more effective solution recommended by public safety experts and veterinary professionals.
Breed Specific Legislation:
Breed Neutral Legislation:
No more lawsuits, no more delays ... freedom wins today in Reynoldsburg
What veterinary, public safety, and legal experts say:
To improve public safety and reduce the number of serious dog bite-related incidents, the scientific studies, experts, and the vast majority (98%) of cities and towns in the U.S. all agree that breed-neutral regulations are the most effective, most equitable, and most enforceable solution. But more importantly, comprehensive breed-neutral regulations are the best solution to protect children, adults, and pets from serious dog bite-related incidents because they address all irresponsible owners and all dangerous dogs, regardless of breed. The old and obsolete policy of "banning dogs" has proven over and over again to be ineffective, unpopular, and difficult to enforce - so it is entirely reasonable that over time, cities and towns with BSL will continue to upgrade their animal control policies by replacing breed-specific bans with more effective, stronger, and comprehensive breed-neutral regulations.
Blog & News
Insight, news, and analysis on issues and topics relevant to pitbull-type dogs.